UK sickness absence statistics
Two official figures, more than double apart, and both correct. Which to quote, which to benchmark against, and why they disagree.
There are two official UK sickness absence figures and they differ by more than double: ONS reports 4.4 days per worker (2.0% of working hours), CIPD reports 9.4 days per employee. Both are correct. ONS asks households and counts only hours actually lost; CIPD asks employers and counts recorded absence days. Which one you should benchmark against depends entirely on what you are comparing.
The two figures, side by side
| ONS | CIPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Days per worker per year | 4.4 | 9.4 |
| As a rate | 2.0% of working hours | ~3.6% of a 260-day year |
| Who is asked | households, via the Labour Force Survey | HR teams, from their own records |
| What counts | only where hours actually fell short of contracted hours | recorded absence days |
| Latest release | 1 May 2026 (2025 data) | September 2025 |
Download these figures as a CSV (opens in Excel, Numbers or Sheets) - the source and check date travel with the file, so a number quoted from it can be traced.
Sources: ONS, Sickness absence in the UK labour market and CIPD, Health and Wellbeing at Work.
Why do the two figures differ so much?
Three reasons, and none of them is that somebody is wrong:
- Who is asked. ONS surveys households, so absence is self-reported by workers. CIPD surveys employers, who read it off HR systems. People under-report their own sick days; systems do not.
- What counts as absence. ONS only counts it where someone actually worked fewer hours than contracted. Make the time up later and, for ONS purposes, it did not happen. An HR system logs it either way.
- Who is in the sample. CIPD's respondents skew towards larger organisations with formal HR functions - exactly the employers most likely to record every absence properly.
Which should you benchmark against?
If you are comparing your own HR records to a national number, use CIPD's 9.4 days. It is the closer like-for-like, because it comes from the same kind of source your figure does. Benchmarking recorded absence against the ONS household figure will make almost any employer look bad for no reason.
Use ONS 2.0% for economy-wide comparisons, or when quoting a figure that has to match what appears in the news - most coverage uses ONS. The one thing worth avoiding is quoting either without saying which, because that is how two people end up arguing about whether 5% is good.
Work out your own with the absence rate calculator, which shows both benchmarks scaled to whatever period you measure.
How has absence changed?
| Period | Days per employee |
|---|---|
| Pre-pandemic | 5.8 |
| 2023 survey | 7.8 |
| 2025 survey | 9.4 - highest in over 15 years |
That is a 62% rise on pre-pandemic levels in employer-recorded absence. CIPD puts mental ill health as the leading cause of long-term absence and the second most common cause of short-term absence.
One caution when reading any 2026 figure: since 6 April 2026 Statutory Sick Pay has been payable from day one, so short absences that once went unpaid and unrecorded now leave a payroll trail. Expect recorded absence to rise again next year partly because it is being counted better, not only because more of it is happening.
What should you actually do with a benchmark?
Less than most people assume. A national average tells you nothing about whether one long-term absence or twenty scattered single days sits behind your number - and those need completely different responses. Read the rate alongside a frequency measure like the Bradford Factor, split short-term from long-term before drawing conclusions, and compare against your own trend last year, which is usually the more honest comparison than any national figure.
And know what absence is costing while you are at it: the absence cost calculator puts a pound figure on it.
When are these figures updated?
Both are annual. ONS publishes its sickness absence article in spring (the 2025 data landed 1 May 2026); CIPD's Health and Wellbeing at Work report has typically appeared in September. We re-check this page against both primary releases each year - if a figure here disagrees with the source, trust the source and tell us.
Frequently asked questions
What is the average number of sick days per year in the UK?
It depends which measure you use. ONS reports 4.4 days per worker (2.0% of working hours) from the Labour Force Survey, where workers report their own absence. CIPD reports 9.4 days per employee from its survey of employers' HR records - the highest in over 15 years.
Why do ONS and CIPD absence figures differ?
Methodology. ONS surveys households and counts absence only where someone actually worked fewer hours than contracted, so time made up later does not register. CIPD surveys employers and counts recorded absence days. CIPD respondents also skew towards larger organisations with formal HR functions, which record absence more completely.
Which absence benchmark should employers use?
For comparing your own HR records against a national figure, CIPD's 9.4 days is the closer like-for-like because it comes from the same kind of source. Use the ONS 2.0% rate for economy-wide comparisons or when matching figures quoted in news coverage.
What is the UK sickness absence rate?
ONS puts it at 2.0% of working hours lost in 2025. CIPD's employer-reported 9.4 days equates to roughly 3.6% of a 260-day working year.
Is UK sickness absence rising?
On the employer-reported measure, yes. CIPD recorded 5.8 days per employee before the pandemic, 7.8 in 2023 and 9.4 in 2025. Note that day-one Statutory Sick Pay from April 2026 means short absences now generate a payroll record, so some of any future rise will reflect better counting rather than more absence.
Keep reading: All 79 HR guides · 45 free templates · 27 calculators
Your own number, always current
CoDash calculates absence rates and Bradford scores from real records - so the comparison against any benchmark starts from a figure you can trust.